Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

3. mars. 2021
8 498 411 Ganger

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

  • Esse estagio da Starship só serão usados os motores na Terra nas manobras de pouso, já na Lua na decolagem de retorno não exigirá tanto dos motores devido menor gravidade, será que estou mais ou menos certo? parabéns a quem tiver coragem de fazer um passeio nessa monstruosa maquina, mais complexa do que o Onibus Espacial, O Elon Musk é um homem de muita FÉ.

    Roberto FigueiredoRoberto Figueiredo2 timer siden
  • Bravo!

    El capo rivascatEl capo rivascat6 timer siden
  • Nice SpaceX Salve para o Brasil kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 🇧🇷

    Eric Alan 89Eric Alan 8912 timer siden
  • Bearley landed

    Niki NolingNiki NolingDag siden
  • ........High altitude?....Are you joking?....there are geese that fly higher than I0k.....Not to mention they also fly faster.....Did I just completely misunderstand or did it take 4 minutes to reach that altitude? Wow, with those specs this SpaceX Rocket will allow us to colonize the Rocky Mountains within the next ten to twenty years. Damn, this cutting edge technology never fails to amaze me.....NOT.

    Donald JohnsonDonald JohnsonDag siden
    • They purposely go slower to avoid super-sonic speeds and to lower vehicle stress. The first orbital flight will go like a falcon 9.

      TimeProTimePro11 timer siden
    • It's a test, and 10km is quite high to fly a test vehicle.

      Ethan RobertsEthan RobertsDag siden
  • Why are these camera shots always shaky? My phone would take a more stable video

    arodg025arodg0252 dager siden
    • Maybe since they're affected by the vibrations 3 fucking powerful engines cause that would otherwise kill you?

      alexnalexnDag siden
  • How many tons of toxic gas going to atmosfere. The advamce have a dark cost.

    Daniel PabloDaniel Pablo2 dager siden
    • none, it uses methane, which burns clean

      NokkNokk2 dager siden
  • The future is now.

    Yarr YoHoYarr YoHo2 dager siden
  • SpaceX is nuts omg Congrats to them

    CaseyJonesCaseyJones2 dager siden
  • epic flip maneuver moment

    Rachhanon SamRachhanon Sam2 dager siden
  • To watch I am fully realized....indeed we are living in the primitives' era technology of transportation..., I am not too obsessed with the USS Enterprise of Startrek TV's movie in 1970 ....but thought they were still more advanced than this one even though Starship USS Enterprise just fiction movies, but I would be pleased to choose to ride with Mr. Spock rather than Mr. Elon a comparison; the Stealth F-117 Nighthawk - Lockheed-Martin is more makes sense to defeat the gravity and return to the earth as usual with the horizontal position for what's it is being spacecraft and thus .....not in the vertical ways to landing...who can guarantee in the even the propulsion engine does not work as expected? the answer is clear....; " Free Fall " as a gun shoot bullet aimed to the sky...the concept of landing with vertical ways has not given the good option for the craft to gliding in case of emergency to saves the souls onboard. it is fully joking for a multi-million project...Elon Musk is too naif to spend his abundant money on this...if I were him...I would rather dump my money to build a free school and teach people how to become a Billionaire like him...

    Admiral AntlantisAdmiral Antlantis3 dager siden
  • This is Old technology, how about show us the gravity propulsion engine that NASA has and works on it since 1947 Roswell?

    e.e.3 dager siden
    • Nice joke

      Callum - カラムCallum - カラム8 timer siden
    • please take your meds

      TuuminshzTuuminshzDag siden
    • What gravity propulsion engine do you speak of? I can't seem to find it.

      TimeProTimePro3 dager siden
  • Love from Pakistan

    Mahad AliMahad Ali3 dager siden
  • 11:44 that looks cinematic

    Kid Alaina BabyKid Alaina Baby3 dager siden
  • They'll be the first people on the Moon haha

    Elza LeshaElza Lesha4 dager siden
  • DOGE/USDT 10x Dogecoin

    Mushroom HeadMushroom Head4 dager siden
  • Keren

    mushtardinomushtardino4 dager siden
  • ohhhhh come ooooooonnnn!!!! where is the explosion???? I was waiting for it!.

    Ivan SanchezIvan Sanchez4 dager siden
  • Caca 💩

    Cristian VenturaCristian Ventura4 dager siden
  • Caca 💩

    Maxi BalboaMaxi Balboa4 dager siden
  • ._.XD

    Luis Mario García ÁlvaresLuis Mario García Álvares5 dager siden
  • Lol. Looks like animation.

    Reiner ZufallReiner Zufall5 dager siden

    Daniele Di LorenzoDaniele Di Lorenzo5 dager siden

    Daniele Di LorenzoDaniele Di Lorenzo5 dager siden
  • Doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure out the cgi part

    tool boxtool box5 dager siden
    • no, just a couple of idiots

      Lmao.Lmao.4 dager siden
    • There's no CGI here whatsoever.

      logitech4873logitech48734 dager siden
  • 10:15 this shot really encapsulates the speed at which it’s falling and then how much the belly flop slows it down

    Cursed BaljeetCursed Baljeet5 dager siden
  • Man SPACEX rocks 🎸 😎

    Josh LambertJosh Lambert5 dager siden
  • Congrats for that cameraman

    John WolvertonJohn Wolverton5 dager siden
  • one word:amazing

    MartianMartian5 dager siden
  • Goodluck

    Romli YasinRomli Yasin5 dager siden
  • Eu não canso de ver isso aqui decolar É muito lindo, é fascinante, é tudo...

    abcabc5 dager siden
    • ааахахахахахаха

      Large CaliberLarge CaliberDag siden

    Freedom & DemocracyFreedom & Democracy5 dager siden
  • And the made it even without naci-engineers!

    Alexandr MaroszAlexandr Marosz6 dager siden
  • Рогозин от злости рвëт батуты 😂 Респект Илону Маску 😇👍

    Охотник за головамиОхотник за головами6 dager siden
    • Я перевел это, ха-ха-ха, фантастика

      bautista mercaderbautista mercader4 dager siden
  • Who has a feeling that Sn15 will be like Sn10 but won't explode 8 minutes later

    SFS JoltSFS Jolt6 dager siden
  • how many time i watched this video?

    spacex_sciencey_timezspacex_sciencey_timez6 dager siden
  • 5:25

    dueidjdueidj7 dager siden
  • Unbelievable

    David HammondDavid Hammond7 dager siden
  • Those rockets are a waste of time and money they're dangerous because you have to carry that fuel for landing which also makes it not economical it's a waste of time and money

    steveissexy 1967.steveissexy 1967.8 dager siden
    • "Why do we need those stupid cars, they are a waste of money, my horse works just fine!"

      Kellogg's FlakesKellogg's Flakes4 dager siden
    • Oh so you just want to watch humanity falter as we progress, no we need to build space rockets capable of mars missions for humans and beyond, if not humans will eventually meet 5hier fate stuck on the planet, I don't see why you say this with such stupidity

      SFS JoltSFS Jolt6 dager siden
    • lol

      TuuminshzTuuminshz7 dager siden
  • I love this

    Guillermo RivasGuillermo Rivas8 dager siden
  • Заебись мультфильм...

    Серж ВладимирскийСерж Владимирский8 dager siden
  • beautiful CGI

    Live TuberLive Tuber8 dager siden
    • There's no CGI here.

      logitech4873logitech48734 dager siden
  • spaceX

    Brien DunphyBrien Dunphy8 dager siden
  • wach sorry

    Brien DunphyBrien Dunphy8 dager siden
  • Flying Squid

    iql dnriql dnr8 dager siden
  • I think Elon musk did the the biggest bottle flip in juman history

    Alexander PerdomoAlexander Perdomo8 dager siden
    • Human history

      Alexander PerdomoAlexander Perdomo8 dager siden

    Buğra Çağrı YURTBuğra Çağrı YURT9 dager siden
  • announcer sounds like a dude from the early 1950's

    lifefunseeker todaylifefunseeker today10 dager siden
    • That's John Insprucker for you! He is an amazing person.

      TimeProTimePro3 dager siden
  • " If it doesn't look like a duck, swim like a duck, and quack like a duck, then it probably isn't a duck "

    [[[] S c o t b o X []]][[[] S c o t b o X []]]10 dager siden
  • oyes desde el segundo 40 al 30 dice hay falla en el sistema

    Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez10 dager siden
  • The dislikes are from aliens

    rbxlessrbxless10 dager siden
  • Focusnici blin

    Андрей КаАндрей Ка10 dager siden
  • Me: shows off my laggy big thicc redstone rocket in random Minecraft creative worlds What I see 5:43

    LeEpicPlayz BaconLeEpicPlayz Bacon10 dager siden
  • So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...

    Elias OhmElias Ohm11 dager siden
  • 1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment

    LoparceGaming826LoparceGaming82611 dager siden
  • gg

    PrimeIXPrimeIX11 dager siden
  • 👍👽

    Виталий ЛукашинВиталий Лукашин11 dager siden
  • It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

    emmmemmm11 dager siden
  • Amazing job!

    Heybar SequeraHeybar Sequera12 dager siden
  • Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

    stringsnarestringsnare12 dager siden
    • Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

      alexnalexn11 dager siden
  • 11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

  • MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

    andre trollandre troll14 dager siden
  • Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

    Frank TuckwellFrank Tuckwell14 dager siden
  • 11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

    Glitched BloxGlitched Blox14 dager siden
  • Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

    bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui14 dager siden
  • Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

    moises gonzalesmoises gonzales14 dager siden
  • Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

    Caio PortellaCaio Portella15 dager siden
  • amazing..

    onemaxlightonemaxlight15 dager siden
  • For a moment, it looked CGI.

    ICOD73ICOD7315 dager siden
    • I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

      Alex HendrixAlex Hendrix13 dager siden
    • Nice

      bcvbb hyuibcvbb hyui14 dager siden
  • The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

    Ailsa NiAilsa Ni15 dager siden
  • Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.15 dager siden
    • I wrote the wrong number of days. It's +400 to 500 days. Yet not for this decade. It's just my opinion, I hope I'm wrong. Thank you Matt for remind me to correct the days. Mr. Lmao, sorry to challenge your beliefs, if you don't agree write why you don't, instead of going straight to offensive words.

      Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.9 dager siden
    • @Lmao. My bad, I'll delete my response

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff10 dager siden
    • @Matt's NOtown stuff i was referring to the original comment

      Lmao.Lmao.10 dager siden
    • so is this "argument" just some copy paste shit or are you part of a hivemind? i've seen this exact comment several times now.

      Lmao.Lmao.10 dager siden
    • @Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff11 dager siden
  • So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

    little Phoenix33little Phoenix3316 dager siden
  • happen live 😂

    vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt16 dager siden
    • @Ailsa Ni what

      Cleanzy'sCleanzy's15 dager siden
    • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

      Ailsa NiAilsa Ni15 dager siden
  • did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

    Wayne DavisWayne Davis16 dager siden
  • hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

    Olavo NevesOlavo Neves17 dager siden
  • congratulations

    SadSmileTVSadSmileTV17 dager siden
  • What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

    JP muroJP muro17 dager siden
    • Hundreds of people went and watched it. There's dozens of amateur videos on NOtown of the launch and landing. There's no CGI here whatsoever, get your eyes checked.

      logitech4873logitech48734 dager siden
    • @JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?

      alexnalexn11 dager siden
    • @JP muro (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10)

      alexnalexn11 dager siden
    • @JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.

      alexnalexn11 dager siden
    • The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature

      JP muroJP muro11 dager siden
  • Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

    JP muroJP muro17 dager siden
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanzy'sCleanzy's15 dager siden
    • looks like a sci fi film

      vbddfy euuytvbddfy euuyt16 dager siden
  • Alles nur lüge

    Björn der SachseBjörn der Sachse17 dager siden
    • Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

      Volksgenosse Erich HoneckerVolksgenosse Erich Honecker16 dager siden
    • Go there yourself and see it for yourself

      alexnalexn17 dager siden
  • This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

    Andy HarrisonAndy Harrison17 dager siden
  • nice cgi

    shark2vshark2v18 dager siden
    • Go to boca chica

      Cleanzy'sCleanzy's15 dager siden
    • You can go there yourself and see it

      alexnalexn18 dager siden
  • Is this even real? It looks like cgi

    John McGrathJohn McGrath18 dager siden
    • yeah, its because it is

      Juan Pablo MuroJuan Pablo Muro11 dager siden
    • @alexn ye

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ17 dager siden
    • Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

      alexnalexn18 dager siden
  • Nice

    Lexi TalksLexi Talks18 dager siden
  • ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง18 dager siden
  • NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

    แก่ง นางแก่ง นาง18 dager siden
  • 12:00 I see starhopper

    Dave TimothyDave Timothy18 dager siden
    • ye love starhopper

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ17 dager siden
  • What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

    Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries18 dager siden
    • @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez18 dager siden
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries18 dager siden
    • @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez18 dager siden
    • @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

      Saanichton MinistriesSaanichton Ministries18 dager siden
    • @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

      Eduardo Rodriguez VazquezEduardo Rodriguez Vazquez18 dager siden
  • Демократия не долетит до Марса.

    Денис ПетинДенис Петин19 dager siden
  • bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

    Pascal FokxPascal Fokx19 dager siden
    • ouais

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ17 dager siden
  • FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • looks like a sci fi film

    vince mmvince mm19 dager siden
    • ye but is real

      KELOO JBL ッKELOO JBL ッ17 dager siden
  • That is bull shit.

    Carmen A. CabelloCarmen A. Cabello19 dager siden
    • @Shorty haha

      It’s grantIt’s grant17 dager siden
    • Carmen is close to karen

      ShortyShorty17 dager siden
    • @alexn thanks for saving me time

      It’s grantIt’s grant18 dager siden
    • Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on NOtown

      alexnalexn19 dager siden
  • 24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

    Nebula DustNebula Dust19 dager siden
  • Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

    collilab laboratorio visivocollilab laboratorio visivo19 dager siden
    • Literally no cgi was used here ._.

      Frivolous BeatnikFrivolous Beatnik12 timer siden
  • Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

    Константин ГолубятниковКонстантин Голубятников19 dager siden
  • I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

    Jephro321Jephro32119 dager siden
    • They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later

      Matt's Youtube stuffMatt's Youtube stuff11 dager siden
    • Did you even seen the live stream?

      K4!T3NK4!T3N14 dager siden
    • This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

      696915 dager siden
    • @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

      alexnalexn19 dager siden
    • @alexn no what it blew up period.

      Jephro321Jephro32119 dager siden
  • launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

    gilbondfacgilbondfac20 dager siden
  • When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

    KK FFKK FF20 dager siden
    • @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap113 dager siden
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

      TimeProTimePro13 dager siden
    • @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap113 dager siden
    • @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

      TimeProTimePro15 dager siden
    • It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

      Epic gamer Heap1Epic gamer Heap115 dager siden
  • Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

    Dolores IzabellaDolores Izabella20 dager siden
  • Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

    Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê21 dag siden
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

      It’s grantIt’s grant18 dager siden
    • @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

      alexnalexn19 dager siden
    • @alexn I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

      Huỳnh Đức LêHuỳnh Đức Lê19 dager siden
    • Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

      alexnalexn19 dager siden